Google Chrome
- DarkShallFall
- Posts: 1992
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:49 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I also noticed that multiple home pages doesnt work with Google chrome like they do with Firefox.
That doesn't work ;/
Code: Select all
http://forums.halomods.com/|http://wsnx.com/cc-common/streaming_new/index.html?refreshed=yes|http://www.myspace.com/

Iron_Forge wrote:I assume I won?..I should get an emblem...
Yes, but it shouldn't hinder the speed to such a point that we call it "slow".h3l10s wrote:You all do realize that with increased options or features, the speed of the browser will be reduced, don't you? Hence, no Ad-Block or any other 'special features' that some have been complaining about. And EVERYONE has been raving about the speed. Please make up your mind.


DarkShallFall, you should do a little researching before 'Fack you Google chrome' because there was a specific intent on each tab having it's own process. This is a quote from Wikipedia "Each tab in Chrome is sandboxed into its own process to prevent malware from installing itself or using what happens in one tab to affect what happens in another" This means, each process is stripped of it's rights and can compute but can not write files or read from sensitive areas (ie My Document, Desktop, etc). To an informed individual this really makes a lot of sense. Do I need to go into further details?DarkShallFall wrote:I just used it and for some reason I had 4 processes called chrome. 1 was the main program, and the other 3 where all the tabs I had open. Fack you Google chrome. Most the time when I opened a link in a new tab It didn't automatically go. I had to click the go button.
Also, if you copy and paste a link into the address bar, you can actually click 'Paste and go' rather than just paste. Self explanatory, I hope.
Did you NOT check out the tools and options and find where you can specify home page or pages? Is nine not enough for you?DarkShallFall wrote:I also noticed that multiple home pages doesnt work with Google chrome like they do with Firefox.
Edit:
Yes.V0Lt4Ge wrote:Am I the only one who thought it was actually slower than FF and IE?
Edit#2: DrXThirst, you are right, it shouldn't but unfortunately it does. Alas, the imperfect world we all live in.
Last edited by h3l10s on Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Aumaan Anubis
- Posts: 2938
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:01 pm
- Location: Aumaan
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Rofl, Internet forum drama is FTW.
Is the beta even worth downloading?
Does anyone suspect that the 'final' will be much better, or is it so incompetent that I should probably just ignore the whole project?
Edit: Is that like, the record for the user who got RCed the fastest?
Is the beta even worth downloading?
Does anyone suspect that the 'final' will be much better, or is it so incompetent that I should probably just ignore the whole project?
Edit: Is that like, the record for the user who got RCed the fastest?

It is expected, and demanded.Tural wrote:MrMurder, we're going to hold you to that promise.
Yes.
From my experiences, no.
I have no faith in them on this project if this is what they consider to be suitable for a public beta. This is really alpha, or even pre-alpha work, there's no way they should be calling this a beta and distributing it, it just isn't ready.
Could be.
From my experiences, no.
I have no faith in them on this project if this is what they consider to be suitable for a public beta. This is really alpha, or even pre-alpha work, there's no way they should be calling this a beta and distributing it, it just isn't ready.
Could be.
Last edited by Tural on Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I think it isAumaan Anubis wrote:Rofl, Internet forum drama is FTW.
Is the beta even worth downloading?
Does anyone suspect that the 'final' will be much better, or is it so incompetent that I should probably just ignore the whole project?
Edit: Is that like, the record for the user who got RCed the fastest?
But yeah the final will probably be a lot better once they get all their feedback.
- Cryticfarm
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:23 pm
- Location: canada
- Contact:
Drop the chatter of what went down, continue on with the subject at hand.
I was pretty sure chrome was going to take up more ram with its multiple processes loading at once, I mean in a single line one thing at a time happens whereas on chrome it can load multiple things which are assigned their own ram.
I was pretty sure chrome was going to take up more ram with its multiple processes loading at once, I mean in a single line one thing at a time happens whereas on chrome it can load multiple things which are assigned their own ram.