Two signatures

[shadowkhas]

I may add a border, I may not. Dunno.
Which one is cooler, and what could I improve on the better one before I make it my signature image?

BMW M6

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X

[CabooseJr]

I would say the first signature, though I'm not a fan of the logos with the motion blur. I think the signatures would look better without them.

[Senor_Grunt]

The Evo.

[Cuda]

I'd say neither. I'd prefer an M over an Evo any day, but you got the Nissan Z logo as your av, so I'd say make a 350 Sig, or hell, you could just make an M logo that I'll kindly supply.

[WaeV]

I like the first one better for its color/light balance and softness.
I don't like the second one's red blur of a mitsubishi logo, which is also badly placed on the sig.

[shadowkhas]

I'd say neither. I'd prefer an M over an Evo any day, but you got the Nissan Z logo as your av, so I'd say make a 350 Sig, or hell, you could just make an M logo that I'll kindly supply.

Well, I would go with a 350Z picture as my signature, but I was only looking through pictures that I had taken. I'll look around for a good one, though.

And thanks for all of the comments, everyone.

[-Legendary-]

First one is to borinz.. I choose EVO

[shadowkhas]

74.98 KB.
That was a fun game of "let's fit the size requirements."


Y/N?

[Andrew_b]

Wheels need more blur going in a circle.

[shadowkhas]

Wheels need more blur going in a circle.

Wasn't really going for a motion blur effect...just some increased lightness that happens to be parallel to the car. >___>

[JK-47]

74.98 KB.
That was a fun game of "let's fit the size requirements."

http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/5715/68293407km2.png
Y/N?

Much better.