Vista alternatives
Vista alternatives
We need to get a few alternatives for apps for the vista users, like myself. I miss being able to use the uberscreenshot tool.

"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way after you make fun of them, you still have their shoes."-Dranciel ಠ_ಠScottyGee wrote:Smokers suck >_< (to avoid someone saying it later, both literally and in the derogatory way)
- SuperCommando
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:53 pm
- Location: Florida!
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:32 pm
- deathbysn00sn00
- Readers Club
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 2:10 pm
- SuperCommando
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:53 pm
- Location: Florida!
- Contact:
Yes it does and i would also like to say im now officially on DSL.bibbit wrote:You poor, poor dial-up user...
Btw, does Entity work on Vista?
I only have vista because it came with the new comp. Ill have dual boot in about 3 weeks. But i do miss being able to use the internalizer programs.

"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way after you make fun of them, you still have their shoes."-Dranciel ಠ_ಠScottyGee wrote:Smokers suck >_< (to avoid someone saying it later, both literally and in the derogatory way)
- blackdiamond
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:18 pm
- Location: Virginia
.
i HATE VISTA and my dad wont get it off
Vista requirements:
1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor
512 MB of system memory
20 GB hard drive with at least 15 GB of available space
Sure PCs are getting more powerful, but that shouldn't give M$(or anyone) an excuse to bloat their OS. I mean, what does it do to necessitate such high minimum requirements. Keep in mind, too, that since it needs those specs as a minimum, it's gonna have that much less resources to devote to your apps/games etc...
Anyway, just my rant about how, IMHO, an OS shouldn't have to list it's min requirements(look at linux, it can run on an old 386 33Mhz, not with all the abilities a faster PC would allow, but the point is it'll run...)
And having said all that I use Windows XP
.
1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor
512 MB of system memory
20 GB hard drive with at least 15 GB of available space
Sure PCs are getting more powerful, but that shouldn't give M$(or anyone) an excuse to bloat their OS. I mean, what does it do to necessitate such high minimum requirements. Keep in mind, too, that since it needs those specs as a minimum, it's gonna have that much less resources to devote to your apps/games etc...
Anyway, just my rant about how, IMHO, an OS shouldn't have to list it's min requirements(look at linux, it can run on an old 386 33Mhz, not with all the abilities a faster PC would allow, but the point is it'll run...)
And having said all that I use Windows XP

- dazzajay
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:17 am
- Location: Shepparton, Victoria, Australia
- Contact:
![]() |
And Microsoft said... "Vista will be backwards compatible with everything that Windows XP was compatible with"
and what do they do...... lets see, 90% of games don't work attall and if they do its usually at 1 ~ 2FPS.... and that's on top of the line pc's....
so i say.... WHY IN GODS NAME UPDATE TO VISTA ANYWAY?
That's like updating to a Calculator...... if that.
and what do they do...... lets see, 90% of games don't work attall and if they do its usually at 1 ~ 2FPS.... and that's on top of the line pc's....
so i say.... WHY IN GODS NAME UPDATE TO VISTA ANYWAY?
That's like updating to a Calculator...... if that.
A calculator with a video carddazzajay wrote:And Microsoft said... "Vista will be backwards compatible with everything that Windows XP was compatible with"
and what do they do...... lets see, 90% of games don't work attall and if they do its usually at 1 ~ 2FPS.... and that's on top of the line pc's....
so i say.... WHY IN GODS NAME UPDATE TO VISTA ANYWAY?
That's like updating to a Calculator...... if that.

OK i got my enclosure early since they were on sale. Does anyone know how to set up a computer to use duel boot from and external HDD?

"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way after you make fun of them, you still have their shoes."-Dranciel ಠ_ಠScottyGee wrote:Smokers suck >_< (to avoid someone saying it later, both literally and in the derogatory way)
Umm, I play the following games at highest detail on my Vista laptop with hardly any FPS problems: HaloPC\CE, Joint Task Force, GRAW, SimCity 3000, ST:Legacy, and a bunch of unknown-to-most-people games.dazzajay wrote:And Microsoft said... "Vista will be backwards compatible with everything that Windows XP was compatible with"
and what do they do...... lets see, 90% of games don't work attall and if they do its usually at 1 ~ 2FPS.... and that's on top of the line pc's....
so i say.... WHY IN GODS NAME UPDATE TO VISTA ANYWAY?
That's like updating to a Calculator...... if that.
All the applications that I used on my Win2K machine work fine in Vista. I can't stand using WinXP on my main machines (note, its just because I don't like it). I don't know what the fuck your talking about, where the hell you got those statistics for the games or the FPS (asshole most likely). Probably just regurgitated propaganda.
My laptop isn't even top of the line compared to whats out there. But it is the best MacBook Pro you can get
well i figured out the dual boot, now to get my XP disc back. I also got milkshape to work....sort of.

"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way after you make fun of them, you still have their shoes."-Dranciel ಠ_ಠScottyGee wrote:Smokers suck >_< (to avoid someone saying it later, both literally and in the derogatory way)
- HPDarkness
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 6:57 pm
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
![]() |
Just saying that games now probably would run better on a WinXp machine than a Vista machine since it's obvious that vista will designate more resources to itself than WinXP would, therefore allowing more resources for programs.
However, I'm sure that games in the future will be designed to require Vista(a la Halo 2 PC) and so we'll have to get vista to run those games at all.
Also, people like to exaggerate for emphasis on points they're trying to make...
.
Anyway, this is Offtopic. I was in a ranty mood for the first post. Sorry bout that.
However, I'm sure that games in the future will be designed to require Vista(a la Halo 2 PC) and so we'll have to get vista to run those games at all.
Also, people like to exaggerate for emphasis on points they're trying to make...

Anyway, this is Offtopic. I was in a ranty mood for the first post. Sorry bout that.