The Official Post Your Set Up Thread

TomClancey · Post by **TomClancey** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:34 pm

Yes, the bottom up is just how cool paint is to your bmp's =p. And yes, my desktop is uber cluttered with a lot of crap. (half of which I don't use just forget to clear off).

I think its also funny all of you posted about how it loaded from bottom up.

jks · Post by **jks** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:53 pm

Don't really have a pic of my desk, but I have 2 screens, just that our basement flooded recently so I had to move back up stairs here until it's all in order down there again.

AMD athlon 64 3200+
2.5 gb ram (assorted, whatever I could find for a low price)
550W or something PSU
ati X800 GT
36GB raptor OS drive
2x 160GB SATA file drives
1x 300GB external backup drive
CD/DVD drive
2x DVD burner drives
17" and a 15" screen both LCD

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:24 pm

jks, I had that pic in my folder of awesome images, but I can't find it anymore. Got one in a higher res than 1024x768 that you'd be able to PM me? I need my longcat. ;_;

Alexander · Post by **Alexander** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:29 pm

shadowkhas wrote:jks, I had that pic in my folder of awesome images, but I can't find it anymore. Got one in a higher res than 1024x768 that you'd be able to PM me? I need my longcat. ;_;

This is the biggest on Encyclopedia Dramatica

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:55 pm

Yeah, I know about that, but I coulda sworn there was a HUGE resolution of it. Oh well, it'll do for now. Thanks!

G.I.R. · Post by **G.I.R.** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:00 pm

shadowkhas wrote:Yeah, I know about that, but I coulda sworn there was a HUGE resolution of it. Oh well, it'll do for now. Thanks!

I can make you a 'super-high-res' one if you want. =/

DECOY · Post by **DECOY** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:09 pm

My modding setup. (there's another 2 machines under the table.....)

JunkfoodMan · Post by **JunkfoodMan** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:20 pm

Darn DECOY, Stop being so fucking L337!

Alexander · Post by **Alexander** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:34 pm

Sorry about the quality, my phone doesn't do too well in low light.

Tural · Post by **Tural** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:38 pm

That's a pretty sweet note you have there.

Veegie · Post by **Veegie** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:56 pm

Awesome note.

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:34 am

i herd u leik keanu

tru?

noscottno · Post by **noscottno** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:43 pm

Geo · Post by **Geo** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:54 pm

iGeo wrote:Will take a picture soon, I guess.

PC:
Intel Dual Core 6400 @ 2.13GHz/Core
2048MB DDR2 RAM
2x 320GB Western Digital HDD
512MB ATi Graphics something or other, then Vista manages to push it to 1GB.
Dual Booting Windows XP Media Center 2005 and Windows Vista Ultimate.
16x Dual Layer DVD Rewriter +/-
HD 7.1 Surround Sound Card of sorts.
Plus a load of other things I'll remember to post later.

Monitor:
19" LG Widescreen 16:10
5ms Response
2000:1 Contrast Ratio
1400x900 Max Resolution
DVI/VGA Inputs

TV:
32" Samsung LE Series
720p/1080i support.
DVI, VGA, Component, 2x SCART & PC audio inputs.

Consoles:
Xbox 360 Premium, with HD-DVD Player.
PS2 Silver.
Xbox, modified.

and then some 5.1 surround to make it all come to life. =)

All paid for by myself, no instalments or any of that crap.

Picture, finally. Sorry for the quality... long story.

Snave · Post by **Snave** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:12 pm

Nice, clean ftw.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:05 pm

Alexander wrote:Sorry about the quality, my phone doesn't do too well in low light.
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/5198/dsc00220yd6.jpg

That? Low quality for a cell phone? You're crazy...

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:12 pm

gh0570fchurch wrote:That? Low quality for a cell phone? You're crazy...

He was referring to the ISO/graininess of it rather than the pixel size.

Alexander · Post by **Alexander** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:22 pm

shadowkhas wrote:
gh0570fchurch wrote:That? Low quality for a cell phone? You're crazy...
He was referring to the ISO/graininess of it rather than the pixel size.

lol yeah, in fact the original picture was 1632 x 1224

Veegie · Post by **Veegie** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:34 pm

iGeo, I was going to get that TV only in a 40" size.
Is it good?
Biggest problem?

FleetAdmiralBacon · Post by **FleetAdmiralBacon** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:34 pm