D-Day Biped Movie Trailer Teaser... yah...

Doctor · Post by **Doctor** » Sun Jul 16, 2006 2:44 pm

Only spent like an hour on it, about to read up on some animation tuts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQd94K39-9M

That will probably look nothing like what it is going to be like, but meh, now you know its coming.

[cc]z@nd! · Post by **[cc]z@nd!** » Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:21 pm

you'd be interested in the physics 3ds mac has built-into it.

tutorial link.

not to sidetrack you, hope the d-day thing goes good for you, but maybe this will help.

The_Hushed_Casket · Post by **The_Hushed_Casket** » Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:12 pm

[cc]z@nd! wrote:you'd be interested in the physics 3ds mac has built-into it.

tutorial link.

not to sidetrack you, hope the d-day thing goes good for you, but maybe this will help.

Yeah, Reactor is pretty cool. It is made by Havoc, who did the physics engine for Half-Life 2.

JK-47 · Post by **JK-47** » Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:57 pm

The_Hushed_Casket wrote:
[cc]z@nd! wrote:you'd be interested in the physics 3ds mac has built-into it.

tutorial link.

not to sidetrack you, hope the d-day thing goes good for you, but maybe this will help.
Yeah, Reactor is pretty cool. It is made by Havoc, who did the physics engine for Half-Life 2.

Dude, THC you know everything about half life lol.

The question is, do you know how to map? >_>

V0Lt4Ge · Post by **V0Lt4Ge** » Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:58 pm

The_Hushed_Casket wrote:Yeah, Reactor is pretty cool. It is made by Havoc, who did the physics engine for Half-Life 2.

And in Halo 2.

Doctor · Post by **Doctor** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:58 am

I'm using GMax...

[cc]z@nd! · Post by **[cc]z@nd!** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:12 am

too bad they didn't do the physics real well in halo 2, just look at something on the ground after you kill it, like an elite, they twitch... but yeah, the havok physics engine rocks, they use it in the source engine, and it's definitely impressive. but yeah, i think reactor will pair rather well with landmines and their victims

The science of Kaboom · Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:16 pm

it looks ok.

a mammoth · Post by **a mammoth** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:09 pm

[cc]z@nd! wrote:too bad they didn't do the physics real well in halo

the reason halo 2's physics suck is becuase xbox only has a 733 Mhz procesor, which is also occupied with rendering and a whole bunch of other stuff, so actualy for xbox the physics are pretty good compared to most other xbox games

cooldude5990 · Post by **cooldude5990** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:26 pm

you need to do alot more work on it
and why are the bullets so big lol

[cc]z@nd! · Post by **[cc]z@nd!** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:29 pm

cooldude5990 wrote:and why are the bullets so big lol

because they wtfpwn, of course.

rossmum · Post by **rossmum** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:57 pm

Artillery shells mb.