WIP: M4
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 2:17 am
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Plane modelling is the best way to go, and although can give more errors, you can easily see and fix them. I started out box modelling.. never, never again.
Last edited by (THS) Btd69 on Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3178
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 12:19 am
- Location: in ur forums ownin ur noobs
- Contact:
Yes, we know, what I'm saying is people have a tendency to assume a plane-modelled piece of crap is still better than, say, a gun that's been spline-modelled and is like, 99% accurate to the real thing.
Anyways... the forend needs fixing. The sights need fixing. The stock needs fixing. It needs so much detail added to the receiver it's not funny. Edges that should be smoother are sharp as hell and the ones that shouldn't be curved, like the magazine, are curved. I appreciate you tried to get it right... but to be brutally honest I could do something twice as detailed and accurate in an hour, and probably with a lower polycount too.
Don't try to finish models quickly, instead focus on getting them just right before you even think about calling it done. (I know this is a WIP, just a tip for future reference.)
Anyways... the forend needs fixing. The sights need fixing. The stock needs fixing. It needs so much detail added to the receiver it's not funny. Edges that should be smoother are sharp as hell and the ones that shouldn't be curved, like the magazine, are curved. I appreciate you tried to get it right... but to be brutally honest I could do something twice as detailed and accurate in an hour, and probably with a lower polycount too.
Don't try to finish models quickly, instead focus on getting them just right before you even think about calling it done. (I know this is a WIP, just a tip for future reference.)
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 2:17 am
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
rossumm, I in no way stated plane modelling is more accurate, gives better results, or is the way everyone goes.
I agree that you can get better results with different techniques, and im not against that, however im saying its easier to adapt to, that MOST users will find gives THEM an easier time modelling. Thats not to say everyone can model perfect using this technique, but I can see you only see your viewpoint, and im going to leave it at that..
I agree that you can get better results with different techniques, and im not against that, however im saying its easier to adapt to, that MOST users will find gives THEM an easier time modelling. Thats not to say everyone can model perfect using this technique, but I can see you only see your viewpoint, and im going to leave it at that..
so can i see your other weapon models? because, if you have, this one should look a lot better.spark wrote:Well, I used to model weapons a long time ago but I quit for a while and this is my latest model
you never said you were new.spark wrote:No need to be rude. I said I was new okay?
please don't make uninformed posts like that. there's a reason you're not a designer.Royal wrote:whats wrong with 2 boxes a gun can be what ever you want.

Dude. No. Do you even know who Katarn and Snaf are?They are some of the few 1337est modelers that have ever set foot in CE. =D
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: http://www.videotuts.net/
- Contact: