how bout if you slip once, you're off the allow list, just make a new usergroup that everyone who applys for gets, but are removed if they make an annoying sigthinkreddie wrote:okay, so install a phpbb mod that can disable those idiots from posting sigs, and don't punish us.SHOUTrvb wrote:we just have to face it. The majority of the users here cant be trusted to follow the sig rules to that extreme. They'll try and get away with the smallest stuff.
Re-Allow Animated Sigs
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:37 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:37 am
- Contact:
It's not going to happen. We've had way too many problems with this in the past. They're distracting, annoying, and differ you from the original intent of the poster. Even unanimated graphic sigs are somewhat like that to a lesser extent.
If there is a problem on the forums, message me through IRC, AIM, or through PM.
Why We Mod - Completed
- theycallmechad
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 11:30 am
Well, I'm not for everybody choosing to do animated sigs, but if it is to happen one day, I suggest there is a stickied topic where people can post their animated sigs they make and "try out" for the honor of having it posted. It would need to be high quality (nothing distracting), within the size regulations, and approved by other members of this community.
That is the ONLY way I will support the return of the animated sigs (even though I love making them myself).
That is the ONLY way I will support the return of the animated sigs (even though I love making them myself).
- RaVNzCRoFT
- Posts: 6208
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:05 pm
- Location: Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
Just a suggestion. Maybe, depending on the bandwidth space, you could try it.
Disable the IMG tags for the signature block, so only text is allowed in it. Then, if you want an image in your signature, be required to upload it to the site. So then it can reject any signatures over the size limits. Just an idea, I don't even know if it's possible or if it would work. Don't mind me.
Disable the IMG tags for the signature block, so only text is allowed in it. Then, if you want an image in your signature, be required to upload it to the site. So then it can reject any signatures over the size limits. Just an idea, I don't even know if it's possible or if it would work. Don't mind me.
- INSANEdrive
- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:42 pm
- Location: Cell Block #Q (There are a lot of strange people in the world. I should know; I'm three of them...)
- Contact:
I like this ideatheycallmechad wrote:Well, I'm not for everybody choosing to do animated sigs, but if it is to happen one day, I suggest there is a stickied topic where people can post their animated sigs they make and "try out" for the honor of having it posted. It would need to be high quality (nothing distracting), within the size regulations, and approved by other members of this community.
That is the ONLY way I will support the return of the animated sigs (even though I love making them myself).
I don't Like this idea...SHOUTrvb wrote:we could do like a huge graphics art contest like SoTW where the winner would get to basicaly have what ever he wanted as far as sigs go. Maybe even avatars.
"You know what I'd like to be? I mean if I had my goddamn choice, I'd just be the catcher in the rye and all."
or should I?
- INSANEdrive
- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:42 pm
- Location: Cell Block #Q (There are a lot of strange people in the world. I should know; I'm three of them...)
- Contact:
I still don't like it... can't say why ( don't really know why).. but I don't like it..SHOUTrvb wrote:it would be like a one time thing for a long time insane. Maybe one every 1-2 months.
"You know what I'd like to be? I mean if I had my goddamn choice, I'd just be the catcher in the rye and all."
or should I?