Wtf? New discovery?
- xXxCocoFangxXx
- Posts: 3756
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:57 am
- Contact:
Wtf? New discovery?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,395294,00.html
http://gawker.com/5031772/montauk-monst ... -the-c+n+n
http://gawker.com/5031772/montauk-monst ... -the-c+n+n

- DeadHamster
- Posts: 2289
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:38 pm
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
i think they should try to forensically analyze the remains, to either confirm discovery of a new species, or determine what it actually is so people know.
but you can really tell it's a slow news day when they break out the beach gear and austin powers clips.
but you can really tell it's a slow news day when they break out the beach gear and austin powers clips.

ASPARTAME: in your diet soda and artificial sweeteners. also, it's obviously completely safe. it's not like it will cause tumors or anything. >.>
always remember: guilty until proven innocent
always remember: guilty until proven innocent
- Dissolution241
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:34 pm
- Location: Oregon
- guysullavin
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:11 pm
- Location: Niagara-on-the-lake
- Contact:
I was thinking the same thing, heh.latinomodder wrote:Manbearpig
Eh, if it's a new creature, cool. If not, it wouldn't surprise me.
The ocean spits out really odd things, though. If it's not something new, I'm going with the turtle without a shell, theory. But it doesn't look like anything I've ever seen.

- FleetAdmiralBacon
- Posts: 2377
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:01 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Deshelled turtle.
From hell.
From hell.

Everything you'll ever need to know about me.
Need help with Linux, C#, C, Python, Java, PHP, Javascript, CSS, or VB? I'm available from 3:00PM-8:00PM EST on weekdays.
oh a de-shelled turtle almost makes sense, but that thing is huge!
i doubt this is anything realistically out of the ordinary....
if it isn't something that already exists its probably a hokes of some sort.
i doubt this is anything realistically out of the ordinary....
if it isn't something that already exists its probably a hokes of some sort.

please visit mycity...noob modeler package
[IA]Paul wrote:We're gonna have a slumber party and we're gonna put ribbons in our hair and kiss all the boys.
It looks much more like a dog than a turtle, of any sort. The legs are not characteristic of a turtle, at all, nor is the elongated tail, nor is the entire body. The sole reason for anyone to say it's a turtle of any sort is the front of the skull, which even then doesn't give any reasonable support to that theory. The body looks like a dog's, the tail is characteristic of a dog, and the teeth and paws/toes are as well. It has fur around its neck, meaning it had fur at one point, as a dog would. 99% of it has prominent features of a typical canine, the only thing to account for is the 'beak.' It's not a turtle of any sort, the skull is best accounted for as a raccoon, as it looks very similar. Actually yeah, it's a raccoon. Considering 100% of the features (Long legs, long tail, distinct snout and brow, toes, of the carcass can be accounted for in looking at a raccoon skeleton, it's no question in my mind, but let's continue to pursue unfounded claims of mystical creatures. 

Last edited by Tural on Fri Aug 01, 2008 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- RaVNzCRoFT
- Posts: 6208
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:05 pm
- Location: Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
![]() |
![]() |