
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/portable-med ... 236567.php
Ya the RIAA is just gonna charge you money! what happend too "inocent until proven guilty"
I FUCKING HATE THE FUCKING RIAA!

![]() |
![]() |
lolExileLord wrote:As much as I dislike the RIAA, you shouldn't be too concerned about being found guilty, right? I mean, I'm pretty sure you would have to be doing something like downloading music to get charged.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
congress hasnt but international copyright laws hasFleetAdmiralBacon wrote:I'd like to mention that Congress hasn't passed any laws that prevent us from transferring music over peer-to-peers, not yet at least. And, there are some artists who actually support it. (I'd consider them crazy, because no one is that into making music that they just make it for people to listen to)
A tribute to Veegie by AttySHOUTrvb wrote:I'm in love with Tural, but I keep having all these negative discussions with him.
![]() |
![]() |
Hahaha! you're awesomeshadowkhas wrote:Yeah, come on guys, International law doesn't affect us, this is America!
![]() |
I agree, I'd never buy a CD that the RIAA profits off of. I'd also never buy a digital DRM'd track that benefits DRM or the RIAA. I will buy music from independent artists who actually directly receive my money.Alexander wrote:I kind of look at it this way: I'm never going to buy music anyways, I frankly am channeling my money into other things. If the record label will never get my money in the first place, then what's the harm?