HHO alternative fuel

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:23 pm

OwnZ joO wrote:How about a nuclear reaction???

There are by-products of nuclear energies.

Veegie · Post by **Veegie** » Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:24 pm

[quote="OwnZ joO"][quote="gh0570fchurch"][quote="

OwnZ joO · Post by **OwnZ joO** » Tue Sep 04, 2007 6:21 am

shadowkhas wrote:
OwnZ joO wrote:How about a nuclear reaction???
There are by-products of nuclear energies.

MSN Encarta wrote:The law of conservation of mass may be considered valid for chemical reactions (the changes in mass, equivalent to the produced or absorbed energy, are not measurable), but (as was later determined) it is not valid for nuclear reactions, where a much larger quantity of matter is converted into energy

Veegie wrote:
OwnZ joO wrote:
gh0570fchurch wrote:[quote="

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 04, 2007 6:30 am

shadowkhas wrote:
OwnZ joO wrote:How about a nuclear reaction???
There are by-products of nuclear energies.

the end result of nuclear power is electricity and extremely harmful waste that has no were to go but metal bins and are lakes and streams were trying to narrow down the use of nuclear power plants so there is less pollution.

OwnZ joO · Post by **OwnZ joO** » Tue Sep 04, 2007 6:38 am

I'm just saying, we can destroy matter, I'm not suggesting we do it...

TomClancey · Post by **TomClancey** » Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:43 pm

OwnZ joO wrote:
Veegie wrote: No.
Dude what's your problem?

He doesn't have a problem, he's just blunt and uses dry humor.

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:44 pm

OwnZ joO wrote:
shadowkhas wrote:
OwnZ joO wrote:How about a nuclear reaction???
There are by-products of nuclear energies.

MSN Encarta wrote:The law of conservation of mass may be considered valid for chemical reactions (the changes in mass, equivalent to the produced or absorbed energy, are not measurable), but (as was later determined) it is not valid for nuclear reactions, where a much larger quantity of matter is converted into energy

LOL, DUEL OF THE 'PEDIAS wrote:In a nuclear reaction, the total (relativistic) energy is conserved. The "missing" rest mass must therefore reappear as kinetic energy released in the reaction

It's still there in another form.

OwnZ joO · Post by **OwnZ joO** » Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:15 pm

Hehe does it return to its matter state though?

snakejknight · Post by **snakejknight** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:46 pm

matter can be destroyed if it comes into contact with anti-matter (theoreticaly) check it out... wikipedia

i do have my doubts about this HHO stuff... i can't seem to find an answer to this... if the byproduct of the fuel is water, but in order to make the fuel you have to change water, where is the loss of energy? (Einstein stated that you cannot get more energy out of a machine than you put into it)

Darco · Post by **Darco** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 10:03 pm

When the hydrogen and oxygen bond back together?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:01 am

ill just wait to see if he's hummer for the army works

snakejknight · Post by **snakejknight** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:35 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TW2fhf_lKE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vgdv-adqI58

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmte0LdJib8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-amHIgikak

Ballin

haha anyway i know this isnt part of an engine yet... that will take some time (gatta make more units)

but it does work and it is VERY explosive

GametagAeonFlux · Post by **GametagAeonFlux** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:39 pm

Part 3, did you just take a lighter to a milk jug full of gasoline?

snakejknight · Post by **snakejknight** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:41 pm

no thats all HHO i'll probably get better videos tomorrow

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:48 pm

Woo?

You have a quick exploding substance...dunno if that'd work optimally in a car engine, or if the perfect explosion would be a more drawn-out one like gasoline. I'm mostly of the opinion on these sorts of things that if it works, why isn't it in cars already?

snakejknight · Post by **snakejknight** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:12 pm

dunno, but i don't see why it wouldn't work... obviously the amount of gas we made today wasn't enough, but considering it only took 3.5 amps to make that much, and the alternator puts out 60, i think we could easily make it happen

Xiion · Post by **Xiion** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:45 pm

all this chemistry shizzy nizzy hurts me brain. i for one am focusing more on the matter that this so called "HHO" will work, and that perhaps the outcome will be, indeed, quite shocking. I asked my chemistry teacher about the subject, but he got distracted and somehow managed to change the subject to String Theory. >_>

snakejknight · Post by **snakejknight** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:29 am

i certainly hope it does... i spend 220$ a month on gas, it would be nice to put that money to better use

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:09 am

snakejknight wrote:i spend 220$ a month on gas

At that rate, even I'd be interested...

<3 my 36 MPG Escort.

snakejknight · Post by **snakejknight** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:30 pm

i get 15mpg