i loved shoot em upYamagushi wrote:I thought 28 weeks later was great, you want a bad movie, watch 30 days of night or shoot em up. Those were HORRIBLE movies...
28 Weeks later
sneakyn8 wrote:i loved shoot em upYamagushi wrote:I thought 28 weeks later was great, you want a bad movie, watch 30 days of night or shoot em up. Those were HORRIBLE movies...
You guys have got to be kidding, I cant think of any worse movie I've ever seen.... It was sooooooooo corny, the acting was horrible, the story was horrible, the fighting was sooo unbelievable fake and by FAR the worst part of the movie.. I rented it on XBL and I was really really pissed when it was over... It was if it was directed by a 12 year old on coke... Ok Ok!! He runs into the room and its all like bam bam then he does a flip oh yea then he starts shooting some guys and its all like kablam. Then a dude almost shoots him but ummm..... hmm... Well lets throw it in there that hes always eating carrots so we can throw in there that he clogs a gun with one!! OH YEA!!! EXTREME!!Kirk wrote:Shoot 'Em Up was not bad
Don't be.
Watch the movie Conspiracy. That movie makes Shoot em Up and 28 Weeks Later look amazing.Yamagushi wrote:
You guys have got to be kidding, I cant think of any worse movie I've ever seen.... It was sooooooooo corny, the acting was horrible, the story was horrible, the fighting was sooo unbelievable fake and by FAR the worst part of the movie.. I rented it on XBL and I was really really pissed when it was over... It was if it was directed by a 12 year old on coke... Ok Ok!! He runs into the room and its all like bam bam then he does a flip oh yea then he starts shooting some guys and its all like kablam. Then a dude almost shoots him but ummm..... hmm... Well lets throw it in there that hes always eating carrots so we can throw in there that he clogs a gun with one!! OH YEA!!! EXTREME!!
- guysullavin
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:11 pm
- Location: Niagara-on-the-lake
- Contact:
You have to admit, The actor who played the Dad did do a good Dad role (crying was realistic, was very loving for his kids, etc.) its just i think he did a poor job at being infected... asfor the kids, sister was played well, but Brother was just sorta bland... he was very inconsistent with his emotions (he would seem out of it for scenes then he would suddenly be very angry for a split scene) the guy darren (i think) who was the military sniper played his role very, very well, in fact he was my favorite character and (spoiler warning) was very sad when he got incinerated. actors were pretty good in the end, but the only person i got attached to was darren (mentioned above)
another thing i didn't like was the times where a person would ask a question and the person was too dumbfounded to answer... i mean at least they could make a sound of attempt like stuttering or something...
another thing i didn't like was the times where a person would ask a question and the person was too dumbfounded to answer... i mean at least they could make a sound of attempt like stuttering or something...
Not Removing until Prototype comes out. Started 1/7/2009
obj1: DUDE'S GOT A POINT....I GIVE THIS PRODUCT A TRY....HELL WHAT COULD GO WRONG!
waev: caps lock might
- KOH_Church
- Readers Club
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:42 am
- Location: New Jersey
fist off godfather part 2 sucked compared to 1 empire strikes back also except for the im your father part and well yeah back to the future 2 rocked but the thing about old films are the world was a lot simpler then. film was young with little or no cgi and now a days films are way too fake with all the cgi. the first film im going to produce will have zero cgi and more small scale models like star wars was.Danke wrote:Empire Strikes Back, Back to the Future 2, Godfather Part 2KOH_Church wrote:Sequels are never as good as the original. Yes it was a bit lame, but when it comes to killing zombies or "the infected" there's nothing better, I mean come on the helicopter chops up like 50 of them lol
ignore grammar right now i just dont care
- guysullavin
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:11 pm
- Location: Niagara-on-the-lake
- Contact:
- XxPTLegitxX
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:46 am
All your opinion that godfather part 2 sucked and so did empire to the first, many don't say that but ok. and their arent many sequels now adays that I see only new movies and remakes. Rarely I see sequels. "Recent ones I saw": The Dark Knight, The new bourne and clerks two, I liked better than the first. I don't know were you got the idea that just because its a sequel it cant match up to the first.KOH_Church wrote:fist off godfather part 2 sucked compared to 1 empire strikes back also except for the im your father part and well yeah back to the future 2 rocked but the thing about old films are the world was a lot simpler then.Danke wrote:Empire Strikes Back, Back to the Future 2, Godfather Part 2KOH_Church wrote:Sequels are never as good as the original. Yes it was a bit lame, but when it comes to killing zombies or "the infected" there's nothing better, I mean come on the helicopter chops up like 50 of them lol
- guysullavin
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:11 pm
- Location: Niagara-on-the-lake
- Contact:
Agreed, usually they make a bunch of money and try to throw together an idea nice and quick to make more.JK-47 wrote:Because, in fact, a lot of sequels aren't as good as the first.
This is also true, but mostly in cases where the first was meant to explain the beginning of the story, such as Spiderman.JK-47 wrote:Not to say that there's not sequels that are better.
- jackson117
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:03 pm
- Location: OZ
- [RR]RedRene
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:01 am
- Location: England