Time travel a possibility?

DEEhunter · Post by **DEEhunter** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:26 pm

I always thought that there was a different universe where each and every possible outcome is happening. I think time travel is possible but if it were then wouldn't we see people from the future now?

G.I.R. · Post by **G.I.R.** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:31 pm

hollow121314 wrote:think about if you went back like 50,000,000,000 years what would there be.

A room. With a moose.

Senor_Grunt · Post by **Senor_Grunt** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:57 pm

G.I.R. wrote:
hollow121314 wrote:think about if you went back like 50,000,000,000 years what would there be.
A room. With a moose.

AND WE'LL LEAVE YOU TO YOUR.......YOUR...........MOOSEY FATE.

It would be great if we could go back in time, and it was for public use, and it was retard/terrorist proof. I would fix so many mistakes I've made.

ScottyGEE · Post by **ScottyGEE** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:54 pm

Time travel theories and debunkings can go on indefinately. So much so that after theorising and trying to make it happen for so long, you'd wish you were able to do it so you wouldn't have done what you just spent all that time doing.

But that's only the case if you forget to use the flux capacitor to divide by zero.

To answer the question though...No.

Veegie · Post by **Veegie** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:01 pm

DEEhunter wrote:I always thought that there was a different universe where each and every possible outcome is happening. I think time travel is possible but if it were then wouldn't we see people from the future now?

You answered yourself.

newbymodder · Post by **newbymodder** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm

DEEhunter wrote:I always thought that there was a different universe where each and every possible outcome is happening. I think time travel is possible but if it were then wouldn't we see people from the future now?

if u believe there are different universes then by time traveling and changing the past you would just make a new different i guess you could call it a different time, it would be different from the time u left but the time u left and the time u created would both exist at the same time. so basically if we did figure it out we would never know " as stated on page one " because the people that would do it would most likely never come back to the original time they left.

Patrickh · Post by **Patrickh** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:28 pm

The DeLorean approach worked in the 80's, why not give that another shot

Dr.Cox · Post by **Dr.Cox** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:44 am

I have a time machine.

It only goes forward in time at regular speed. Its basically a cardboard box with "Time Machine" written on it with sharpie.

Dark_Destroyer · Post by **Dark_Destroyer** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:20 am

Dr.Cox wrote:I have a time machine.

It only goes forward in time at regular speed. Its basically a cardboard box with "Time Machine" written on it with sharpie.

Ha Ha.
Wait was that even funny?

Tural · Post by **Tural** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:25 am

Stolen joke is stoleeeeeeeeen.

bcnipod · Post by **bcnipod** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:26 am

Time machine is not possible neither is time travel, because it would:
1. create paradoxes
2. Time is a measurement not a road. it cannot be traveled.
3. the concept of time is a man made creation. trying to time travel would be like trying to travel the empire state building.

Tural · Post by **Tural** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:27 am

That analogy did not even make sense.

bcnipod · Post by **bcnipod** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:28 am

Tural wrote:That analogy did not even make sense.

that was the point. thus proving it impossible.

Tural · Post by **Tural** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:30 am

You misunderstood. Your analogy was terrible. Making a terrible analogy was not your intention, do not claim it was. It was not the point. The point is clear, your method is wrong. Your terrible analogy didn't prove anything except your incapability of making a good analogy to explain a complex concept.

bcnipod · Post by **bcnipod** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:32 am

Tural wrote:You misunderstood. Your analogy was terrible. Making a terrible analogy was not your intention, do not claim it was. It was not the point. The point is clear, your method is wrong. Your terrible analogy didn't prove anything except your incapability of making a good analogy to explain a complex concept.

sorry, but i could not come up with a better one on the spot. I was just trying to express that time, since it is a man made concept is similar to that of a man made structure, because as a concept time is unique, which is one of the reasons why I could not come up with a better comparison.

Senor_Grunt · Post by **Senor_Grunt** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:33 am

I time travel every day. But I don't call it time travel, I call it sleep.

It seems like when you fall asleep, to me it may seem like 5 minutes I'm asleep, but wake up 7-8 hours later. So my time machine only lets me go to the future. Not past.

Tural · Post by **Tural** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:34 am

Hur dee hur hur.

Philly · Post by **Philly** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:24 am

Senor_Grunt wrote:I time travel every day. But I don't call it time travel, I call it sleep. It seems like when you fall asleep, to me it may seem like 5 minutes I'm asleep, but wake up 7-8 hours later. So my time machine only lets me go to the future. Not past.

This is true. I wake up in the morining, and I usually have thoughts like this...

Phil's brain: OHSHI! It's been 5 minuites since the alarm went off you baffoon! Get the crap out of bed!
Phil's Body: No, go back 5 minuites please.
Phil's brain: That's not possible you cheese muffin. Time goes forwards.
Phil's Body: Zzzzzzz...
Phil's brain: Are you listening to me?

Aumaan Anubis · Post by **Aumaan Anubis** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:34 am

Didn't Einstein prove that time travel was possible?

Or am I just going crazy...

bcnipod · Post by **bcnipod** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:43 am

Aumaan Anubis wrote:Didn't Einstein prove that time travel was possible?

Or am I just going crazy...

I think you are going crazy.