Halo 3 Weapons for PC pack - Progress so far

TAZZ · Post by **TAZZ** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:09 pm

SuperSnorky wrote:Is the assault rifle gonna be tilted forward? Cause in that first person picture of the assault rifle, it looked straight.

Well like I said in an earlier post, when you tilt it forward then the display gets messed up, so for now I'm leaving it as it is.

EDIT: Nevermind.

Yes/No?

{TP}Spartan · Post by **{TP}Spartan** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm

get rid of the cubemap mb?

Sonic5561 · Post by **Sonic5561** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:43 pm

TAZZ wrote:
Yes/No?

Yes.

Also I'm liking the new sniper skin.

CabooseJr · Post by **CabooseJr** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:14 am

Try to change the multipurpose a little bit.

SL!P · Post by **SL!P** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:25 pm

So, whats the point of having halo 3 weapons in halo 1?

Andrew_b · Post by **Andrew_b** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:33 pm

2 b m3g4 l337 [)U[)3.

lol idk..to be cool, i think making halo 3 things on pc is pointless. on CE they are kind of good but not like the real thing.

CMT got pretty dang close though but meh. good job.

ecko3 · Post by **ecko3** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:08 pm

For the pistol you should make it black chromed & shinny.

sangheili · Post by **sangheili** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:56 pm

The spartans look like they have an elite cubemap, but theyre very shiny. O and compared to the other weapons, the assault rifle looks small. I know it cant really be helped as the display is whack, but it looks out of place compared to the others.

Sonic5561 · Post by **Sonic5561** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:20 am

Andrew_b wrote:
CMT got pretty dang close though but meh. good job.

^I disagree with the above statement. Why does everyone say this? Look at the Spiker, the model is different, the animations are different, the damage is different, bitmap has blood on it, Look at MA5C, bitmap is different, animations are different. Look at Battle Rifle, animations were different except for reload which was kinda similar, has a grenade launcher.

The weapons CMT makes are not close to Halo 3. If your talking about CMT's SPv2 well those weapons are close to Halo 3 then.

InvaderVeex · Post by **InvaderVeex** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:44 am

Sonic5561 wrote:^I disagree with the above statement. Why does everyone say this? Look at the Spiker, the model is different, the animations are different, the damage is different, bitmap has blood on it, Look at MA5C, bitmap is different, animations are different. Look at Battle Rifle, animations were different except for reload which was kinda similar, has a grenade launcher.

Yeah, well that's because they had no idea what the Halo 3 version would really be like.

I think that AR needs a lot more work (compared to you other stuff). Such as that power button/light and more details.

Pepsi · Post by **Pepsi** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:02 am

TAZZ wrote:

why does the bottom half of that AR look so famular?

TAZZ · Post by **TAZZ** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:34 am

Maybe because I added topography and darkened it a whole lot

Andrew_b · Post by **Andrew_b** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:10 pm

Sonic5561 wrote:
Andrew_b wrote:
CMT got pretty dang close though but meh. good job.

^I disagree with the above statement. Why does everyone say this? Look at the Spiker, the model is different, the animations are different, the damage is different, bitmap has blood on it, Look at MA5C, bitmap is different, animations are different. Look at Battle Rifle, animations were different except for reload which was kinda similar, has a grenade launcher.

The weapons CMT makes are not close to Halo 3. If your talking about CMT's SPv2 well those weapons are close to Halo 3 then.

...ok im not saying i love cmt. i dont really. but im saying out of all the shitty h3 weapons they have been the closest...if your saying theirs sucks why are you supporting this guy?

Mr.Brightside · Post by **Mr.Brightside** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:26 pm

Cryticfarm · Post by **Cryticfarm** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:29 pm

Mr.Brightside wrote:QFT.

What are you quoting?

Sonic5561 · Post by **Sonic5561** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:49 pm

Andrew_b wrote:
Sonic5561 wrote:
Andrew_b wrote:
CMT got pretty dang close though but meh. good job.

^I disagree with the above statement. Why does everyone say this? Look at the Spiker, the model is different, the animations are different, the damage is different, bitmap has blood on it, Look at MA5C, bitmap is different, animations are different. Look at Battle Rifle, animations were different except for reload which was kinda similar, has a grenade launcher.

The weapons CMT makes are not close to Halo 3. If your talking about CMT's SPv2 well those weapons are close to Halo 3 then.
...ok im not saying i love cmt. i dont really. but im saying out of all the *** h3 weapons they have been the closest...if your saying theirs sucks why are you supporting this guy?

Well I'll say this. CMT's weapons don't suck. The reason for me is because they're not exactly like Halo 3. They are like Halo 3 weapons but with new animations which to me makes them seem original.

SL!P · Post by **SL!P** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:28 pm

I love how quikly we begin to loose track of the original discussion.

Lol

Mr.Brightside · Post by **Mr.Brightside** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:46 pm

cryticfarm wrote:
Mr.Brightside wrote:QFT.
What are you quoting?

Andrew.

Yeah, keep giving me shit, internet scene kid. I don't care.

Cryticfarm · Post by **Cryticfarm** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:35 pm

Mr.Brightside wrote:
cryticfarm wrote:
Mr.Brightside wrote:QFT.
What are you quoting?
Andrew.

Yeah, keep giving me ****, internet scene kid. I don't care.

QFT=Quote for truth. That means you actually have to quote someone.

Mr.Brightside · Post by **Mr.Brightside** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:38 pm

I don't have to press the quote button to quote someone.

anyway, Tazz, the first sniper looked better in my opinion. But pretty nice otherwise.