Page 1 of 1

Scarab

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:32 pm
by JK-47
Image

Just a quick edit; I liked the results.

Re: Scarab

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:30 am
by Ketchup_Bomb
He'sa chargin' his lazer.

gg, Sarb. gg.

Edit: JK.. my bad. gg Ketchup. gg.

Re: Scarab

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:07 pm
by INSANEdrive
Ketchup_Bomb wrote:He'sa chargin' his lazer.

gg, Sarb. gg.
JK-47, not Sarb.

Re: Scarab

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:13 pm
by MoDFox
INSANEdrive wrote:
Ketchup_Bomb wrote:gg, Sarb. gg.
JK-47, not Sarb.
I made the same mistake at first =P I saw "Scarab" and though "Sarb".
Good job on the sig, the bars on the top and bottom could blend a bit better but its pretty good.

Re: Scarab

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:46 pm
by mxrider108
Nice, but I think it would look better with a little more width.

Re: Scarab

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:31 pm
by JK-47
Ketchup_Bomb wrote:He'sa chargin' his lazer.

gg, Sarb. gg.
INSANEdrive wrote:
JK-47, not Sarb.
gg, Ketchup, gg.
Thanks anyways :p
mxrider108 wrote:Nice, but I think it would look better with a little more width.
There was too much empty space that I wasn't happy with, so I cropped it out.

Re: Scarab

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:33 pm
by Cuda
it's very blurry, and with the black background and the deep shadowing, at first, it was very hard to make out what it was.

Re: Scarab

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:38 pm
by JK-47
Gaussian blur is probably at fault for that. Here's the sig without it:

Image

I've never really used it before, so I decided to experiment a bit.

Re: Scarab

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:42 am
by SHOUTrvb
I like it a lot both ways. Maybe a happy medium? It's a good sig-worthy shot either way. Nice.

Re: Scarab

Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:55 pm
by diamondbackk60
looks great i like it