Page 1 of 1
my second sig
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 12:37 am
by psyKo
hey
seein as for my first sig everybody flamed me...i made some new ones...
well...i made versions of it...
i hope you like them this time....i personally like the blue one more...
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 5:54 am
by RaVNzCRoFT
For the first one, it needs some more color. As for the second one, if you take out the crappy render, the crappy blue gel effect, and the crappy flame effect, you'll have a better sig.
Sorry, they're not too good. Keep working on it. Practice will do nothing but make you get better.
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 8:39 am
by psyKo
lol...i agree with more colour in the first one...but the second one i disagree with everything you said
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 9:09 am
by RaVNzCRoFT
Now that I think about it...I actually like the first's backround, but it needs some color. Maybe make that backround blue, instead of the blue gel.
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 9:14 am
by Reklaimur
Yeah, I like the first one.
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 9:26 am
by psyKo
what dont you like about the blue one?
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:18 am
by Blitz1008
look at where the flame meets the blue, all that weird squished stuff, and the flame looks kinda cheesy. i like the color blue, but its not workin there
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:01 pm
by psyKo
think of the squished stuff as gel...mixin with the flame...i think you guys have totally misunderstood what is goin on in the sig...but hey...whatever
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:14 pm
by M9 HE-DP Grenade
i like it 7.5/10
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:23 pm
by Blitz1008
how do you "misunderstand" a sig, its a picture!
all im saying is that the pixels around the flame look way too grainy and rough, smooth it down some
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:40 pm
by psyKo
what i mean is...some people might think that the gel stuff mixed with the flame is a mistake or something...it isn't!
and the 'rough pixeled' flames...meh...cant be bothered changin it...
thanks to everybody that has left a positive comment...