Rate the sig above you.

Ketchup_Bomb · Post by **Ketchup_Bomb** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:02 am

Awful. You really need to work on your work. 1/5

Rate: (This one was a quickie. Probably made in about 5 minutes. It doesn't show, does it?

)

GreenbayGeneral · Post by **GreenbayGeneral** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am

icky....

2.45/5

SurfingSpartan · Post by **SurfingSpartan** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:08 pm

umm not that great 2/5

r0tten · Post by **r0tten** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:23 pm

i like the concept but the render doesnt really match the guy too well, i meen the colors match, but the guy looks a little blurry which throws me off a bit and i don't really like the fonts.

but like i said i like the concept and it could be good with some improvements.

3/5

oh and if you stare at my face on my sig too long you'll get cancer.

... coinsidently i had cancer then chuck norris roundhouse kicked it out of me.

GreenbayGeneral · Post by **GreenbayGeneral** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:24 pm

.65/5

r0tten · Post by **r0tten** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:30 pm

.65/5 for me? i know its not the best but i really think you just post in here to try and make up for some past traumatic childhood experience that left you feeling inadaquate in more ways than one. i don't think i've seen you actually give a review/rating that was even decent in here. you pretty much just seem like youre being rude to me, which i dont think was the intentions of this thread. why dont you try giving some constructive critisism instead of just trying to be mean.

oh and your review:

you're render looks good but it's a little played out, i have seen almost the exact same on a million times, the jet looks good though. the border leaves me wanting something more and the spot where the nose of the jet and the wing touch the bottom and reun into the border just looks bad it just leaves a big ugly black triangle.

3/5

GreenbayGeneral · Post by **GreenbayGeneral** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:36 pm

r0tten wrote:.65/5 for me? i know its not the best but i really think you just post in here to try and make up for some past traumatic childhood experience that left you feeling inadaquate in more ways than one. i don't think i've seen you actually give a review/rating that was even decent in here. you pretty much just seem like youre being rude to me, which i dont think was the intentions of this thread. why dont you try giving some constructive critisism instead of just trying to be mean.

i gave that to u for a reason... u just put some text on a black and red canvas wow!

Xero · Post by **Xero** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:40 pm

7.5/10

r0tten · Post by **r0tten** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:42 pm

sorry i didnt have the uber1337 played out render you had, and maybe you should turn up your brightness on your screen or better yet get a good monitor because its not just a black and reb background with some text. like i said mines not that great but i've seen some pretty crappy sigs in here and people atleast have the common courtisy to leave a real rating, you know when you say shit like ".65/5

" you just sound like a douche.

xero yours looks freaking awesome i have no complaints 10/10 it looks fantastic, all the colors blend so well and i even like the font which is rare for me.

GreenbayGeneral · Post by **GreenbayGeneral** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:46 pm

r0tten wrote:sorry i didnt have the uber1337 played out render you had, and maybe you should turn up your brightness on your screen or better yet get a good monitor because its not just a black and reb background with some text. like i said mines not that great but i've seen some pretty crappy sigs in here and people atleast have the common courtisy to leave a real rating, you know when you say *** like ".65/5 " you just sound like a douche.

xero yours looks freaking awesome i have no complaints 10/10 it looks fantastic, all the colors blend so well and i even like the font which is rare for me.

ok ok i am sorry jeeze dont cry!!!!!!!!!!!

.89/5

i am not saying that my sigs is 121241235423243/5 i am just saying its some bad text on a red and black BG with some teches looking lines wow!

Ombre · Post by **Ombre** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:49 pm

GreenbayGeneral
6.5/10 I don't really care for the background and text.

Veegie[Temp] · Post by **Veegie[Temp]** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:52 pm

To gothy for me....And the background reminds me to much of difference clouds.

GreenbayGeneral · Post by **GreenbayGeneral** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:04 pm

i like the windmill its awesome and the text isnt to great but it fits

7/10

=sw=warlord · Post by **=sw=warlord** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:07 pm

edit*
nevermind....

Explosive American · Post by **Explosive American** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:34 pm

I think that anyone who has dissed GreenBay's fighter sig should know. Ketchup made that for him. If you're dissing him, you're dissing ketchup. I just thought that was funny.

"Signature exceeded 75kb". Wow. Witty.

GreenbayGeneral · Post by **GreenbayGeneral** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:51 pm

Explosive American wrote:I think that anyone who has dissed GreenBay's fighter sig should know. Ketchup made that for him. If you're dissing him, you're dissing ketchup. I just thought that was funny.

"Signature exceeded 75kb". Wow. Witty.

no i made it

teh ketch anit that skilled

Tsuin Taiyou · Post by **Tsuin Taiyou** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:23 pm

GreenbayGeneral: I'm just rating your current. I like the brushing, it fits the render, I like it, good job. 8/10.

Rate:

Xero · Post by **Xero** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:36 pm

7.5/10 looks ok but kinda sharp in the middle.

V0Lt4Ge · Post by **V0Lt4Ge** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 9:52 pm

*bumpity bump bump*

7/10, 8/10 with better text.

rate current

GreenbayGeneral · Post by **GreenbayGeneral** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 9:53 pm

i dont like the BG brushing

or the text bar..

other than that 7/10

HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

Rate the sig above you.

Is Xero 1337?