Page 1 of 2

WHY HALO 3 IS GONNA SUCK

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:21 pm
by almasri
ok so we all know tha halo 3 :shock: (OMG) :shock: is comeing out on tuesday, but ill tell you some reasons this game will suck balls and why im not getting it.

1. this game costs $60 and if your a real dweeb youll buy the collectors additon that will but you back $100 or more im not sure.

2. this is pretty much it there not going to be a halo 4 or a halo 6 1/2 this is it.

3. what you cant be a brute? weak.

4. things you cant use: jackalshield, scarab,phantom,pelican,longsord,and whatever else i forgot.

5. WTF is a mauler?

6. forge looks like it is going to be confusing as hell and youll spend more time makeing a map than playing it.

7. a spartan laser? thats just going to be like halo2's noob combo and dont tell me it wont.

8. xbox live is going to be free for 3 days? why? thats just going to create more connection traffic and it will be running sluggish.

9. why is earth all of the sudden allies with the elites? it should be that there fighting each other and earth at the same time.(be more interesting :D )

10. someone is going to come alaong and mod this game and its going to be like halo2 on live was all over again

if you disagree or have something something else to add go ahead . and the only thing that doesnt suck is the ending i watched it already :D

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:24 pm
by Tural
You're so cool.

Let's see which of your ideas are actually valid:
1) That doesn't have anything to do with the gameplay.
2) It's the end of MC's story, they never called it the end of Halo.
3) That's just stupid. There's something we like to call "balance."
4) Takes away from the core of Halo.
5) That's not even a complaint, it's just ignorance.
6) Your only remotely valid point, even so, it's fairly straight forward. Will it take time to learn? Yes. In all seriousness, if you want to make a good map, you should spend a lot of time on it.
7) It's balanced. Clearly you haven't bothered to educate yourself on the matter.
8) Not a complaint about the game.
9) Ignorance to the storyline.
10) No.

So basically, everything you said was wrong, unfounded, ignorant, or didn't make any sense.

Awesome. Sure convinced me that Halo 3 is going to suck. You're a genius.

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:27 pm
by -Legendary-
I disagree. (Not with Tural.)

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:27 pm
by almasri
what? am i not allowd to express my opinions? is it wrong to do that?

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:29 pm
by -DeToX-
All games cost around 60$ when brand new. And some people want to pay more for extra things, that is their choice, what relevance does it have to why you won't buy it?

2. More of a reason to buy it...


3. Brutes would ruin multiplayer in my opinion. Elites/Arbiter and Masterchiefs are the most balanced.

4. Jackal shield, so? It would be cheap. Scarab, Cheap. Phantom, Cheap, pelican, longsword, makes all the campaign cheap. And is also cheap in MP.

5. Mauler is a Shotgun.

6. Forge is actually very easy and you can make a map in a couple of minutes... You never tried it, your just trying to find reasons not to like it.

7. Spartan Laser is balanced... If you know how to combat it, then why does it matter? N00b combo in Halo 2 wasn't a problem, only the REAL noobs complained about it because they couldn't counter attack it.

8. No it won't. Sorry to hear you like to try and make up reasons to not like things... It will be the same.

9. If you played Halo 2 campaign, you would know... That statement you made is just stupid, you wouldn't buy it just because of that.

10. So? It shouldn't ruin the game. If people cheat, you have a video system to report to bungie.

Conclusion: Play the game before you make up statements that are either not thought out, or just make no sense... And honestly even if you played it already and you don't like it, you must be REALLY slow if it takes you that long to make a map in forge.

Alot of those reasons aren't even reasons.

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:29 pm
by -Legendary-
almasri wrote:7. a spartan laser? thats just going to be like halo2's noob combo and dont tell me it wont.
It won't.

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:30 pm
by almasri
-Legendary- wrote:
almasri wrote:7. a spartan laser? thats just going to be like halo2's noob combo and dont tell me it wont.
It won't.
yes it will

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:32 pm
by Tural
If you keep making these unfounded claims and being ignorant to everything you claim will suck, in addition to being arrogant towards others' corrections, this topic's going to get locked. If you can't have an intelligent discussion with sound reasoning and logic, then this topic does not warrant a place on this board.

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:32 pm
by kornkidcrazy
almasri wrote: yes it will
Did you ever play the Beta or do you have Halo 3 now?

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:33 pm
by almasri
kornkidcrazy wrote:
almasri wrote: yes it will
Did you ever play the Beta or do you have Halo 3 now?
yes i did play the beta and it thought it was a cheap weapon

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:35 pm
by Dojorkan
Yeah, quite obviously a troll.
I know some Sony and Nintendo fanboys, and even their complaints are ore valid then this guy's.
almasri wrote:
-Legendary- wrote:
almasri wrote:7. a spartan laser? thats just going to be like halo2's noob combo and dont tell me it wont.
It won't.
yes it will
How so? It barely has anything in common.
almasri wrote:what? am i not allowd to express my opinions? is it wrong to do that?
Are we not entitled to ours?


Seriously though, about the price of the normal version... have you never bought a new game before? Are do you just pirate them?

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:36 pm
by -DeToX-
almasri wrote:
kornkidcrazy wrote:
almasri wrote: yes it will
Did you ever play the Beta or do you have Halo 3 now?
yes i did play the beta and it thought it was a cheap weapon
Maybe because you sucked too much to defend yourself from it... ;/

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:36 pm
by Pyroman
Sony fan boy. :wink:

Good to know your opinion. But I strongly disagree with all your ludicrous reasons.

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:38 pm
by almasri
they dont have to have anything in common its just a weapon thats going to throw the weapon blance off. and what does this have to do with likeing sony or not i dont even have a ps3.

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:38 pm
by Tural
Evidence supporting such a claim?

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:40 pm
by almasri
Tural wrote:Evidence supporting such a claim?
the beta

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:43 pm
by Tural
"The beta" is not evidence for unbalancing, it is a source for evidence. I wish to see your evidence for all of your claims. You blurt out all sorts of ridiculous things, things which don't even make sense, then ignore when people destroy your credibility. This isn't even a discussion, you're just picking out parts you think you can argue, and neglecting to acknowledge that people have debunked nearly everything you say. I fail to see how you expect to be taken seriously with such an ill-fated topic of discussion and inability to address those addressing your unfounded logic.

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:46 pm
by Dojorkan
Even something like an example would help. I don't recall having a lot of trouble taking out a spartan laser. Its just like any other medium-long range weapon.

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:47 pm
by almasri
Tural wrote:"The beta" is not evidence for unbalancing, it is a source for evidence.
your right but they might not have changed it

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:48 pm
by Tural
Again, that still is not reasoning. Please pay attention.

Provide
Evidence
To support
Your claim
That it is
Unbalanced

Clear enough?

Saying it's "unbalanced in the beta" does not prove it was. You need to state why it was unbalanced. What makes it so overpowered with no downside? It is balanced, and that is why you fail to provide evidence to suggest that it is not.