
The Official Halo 3 Vehicles Thread
- MaestroMan
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:01 am
- Location: Free Adam Coffeeshop, Amsterdam
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:35 pm
- Contact:
![]() |
-
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 11:53 am
- Contact:
![]() |
- xXxCocoFangxXx
- Posts: 3756
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:57 am
- Contact:
- FleetAdmiralBacon
- Posts: 2377
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:01 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
It is a human air vehicle..

Everything you'll ever need to know about me.
Need help with Linux, C#, C, Python, Java, PHP, Javascript, CSS, or VB? I'm available from 3:00PM-8:00PM EST on weekdays.
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:35 pm
- Contact:
![]() |
- MaestroMan
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:01 am
- Location: Free Adam Coffeeshop, Amsterdam
- Contact:
- gh0570fchurch
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:04 am
- Location: San Diego Area, CA
- Contact:
![]() |
- MaestroMan
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:01 am
- Location: Free Adam Coffeeshop, Amsterdam
- Contact:
The Wasp looks pretty crummy in al fairness, I don't see why everyone is against a dropshipHyperdash wrote:Yes for the mongoose. And no for the pilotable peli or longsword. Maybe make it so theres like a weapon that makes a pelican drops weapons to that local and a weapon that makes the longsword commence a bombing run on that local

MaestroMan wrote:...I don't see why everyone is against a dropship
a mammoth wrote:You see a phantom or pelican kinda would ruin most maps, even containment, they are just to big. So if you have a huge enough map to make a pelican seem right, it will be too big for walking, it kinda sucks.
My real name is a Mammoth, if someone who cares sees this, please change my name to a Mammoth
- MaestroMan
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:01 am
- Location: Free Adam Coffeeshop, Amsterdam
- Contact:
[/quote]a mammoth wrote:You see a phantom or pelican kinda would ruin most maps, even containment, they are just to big. So if you have a huge enough map to make a pelican seem right, it will be too big for walking, it kinda sucks.
Example: Gulf of Oman, Battlefield 2:MC, huge map, has land vehicles, and has large air vehicles such as the Black Hawk, but the map worked out perfectly and is brilliant, so you could do the same thing in halo 3, except make it more of an area to rescue destroyed platoons, instead of taking over land, who knows...

- gh0570fchurch
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:04 am
- Location: San Diego Area, CA
- Contact:
![]() |
Why would MC be piloting a dropship? That's what the pilots are for. Also, since MC is a combat specialist, why would you let him pilot the dropship and let the Marines fight? So instead of letting the less compitent fighters pilot, they let the highly compitent one waste that ability on piloting. Just my thoughts.MaestroMan wrote:I don't see why everyone is against a dropship
Did anyone ever wonder how so many SPARTAN-II warriors appeard form nowhere for the muliplayer?
Anway, I think there should be a human air viecle, with a second gunner seat, like a mounted machine gun turret wiht secondry fire of rokcets. That would completely pwn. But in fairness of the extra peron and oh-so-massive-anhilliating-gun-turret ad turreteer, it would be bigger, there fore slower and less manerable. But stronger and better shields.
Who agrees with me?
Anway, I think there should be a human air viecle, with a second gunner seat, like a mounted machine gun turret wiht secondry fire of rokcets. That would completely pwn. But in fairness of the extra peron and oh-so-massive-anhilliating-gun-turret ad turreteer, it would be bigger, there fore slower and less manerable. But stronger and better shields.
Who agrees with me?