Page 1 of 1
Directx 10 card not needed for Halo 2 PC!!! O_O
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 12:37 pm
by Joe333
I'm too excited to explain myself so read this article on bungie.net
http://bungie.net/News/TopStory.aspx?li ... temay262k7
YAY!!!!!!
Will I need a DirectX 10 graphics card to run Halo 2 on PC?
No. Although you will require Windows Vista to play Halo 2 on a PC, you won't necessarily need to upgrade your graphics card to do it. Halo 2, like some other Vista titles, will work just fine on a wide range of graphics cards, including DX9 cards. We will provide far more detailed minimum hardware requirements closer to the game's completion.
YAY!!!!!!! I can use my ATI Radeon X850 XT PE 256MB PCI-E Video card to play
!!!
Joe333
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 8:44 am
by UchihaSasuke
but you still need windows vista =_=, hope my sucks computer can take it
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:38 pm
by Damorian
Microsoft has a program that will test if your computer can handle Vista. You can also download the Beta 2 now which, in my opinion rox.
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:04 am
by xbox
heres the requirments dont have a link to beta download
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/window ... tarpc.mspx
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:23 pm
by Kirk
I don't see why so many people are making a big deal about vista. Why is this a bad thing? I'd be happy to get rid of my old system to get a new one. The requirements for Vista seem very low too, anyone with a graphics card 6 years old should be able to run it....
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:24 pm
by JK-47
Yay, I can get it
Yeah, Id be
really happy to get rid of XP for the new line of OS. New operating systems are always really cool.
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:40 pm
by Spyke72
Yes, I can run it. But, what IS it? Simply a download? How can it make your graphics more pretty?
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:56 pm
by Kirk
It's like the difference between Windows 98 and 2000... And 95 with 98. Get it? I wouldn't say 2000 to XP since there is a major difference in appearance with those two.
Kind of. Obviously I'm not a major expert in this.
I'd get it without thinking, that's all I know.
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:24 pm
by angry man
Kirk wrote:It's like the difference between Windows 98 and 2000... And 95 with 98. Get it? I wouldn't say 2000 to XP since there is a major difference in appearance with those two.
Kind of. Obviously I'm not a major expert in this.
I'd get it without thinking, that's all I know.
Except for the fact that windows 2000 was terrible
not to metion windows ME
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:31 pm
by Tural
Angry Man wrote:Except for the fact that windows 2000 was terrible
not to metion windows ME
Number four worst tech product of all time
=o
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:04 am
by gh0570fchurch
BTW, Tural, that list had 5 items on it lol.
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 1:39 pm
by Kirk
It actually has 25. But he wasn't saying it had 4, he was talking about the 4th worst tech item, not that there are 4.
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:00 pm
by angry man
lol i agree with that site about AOL being number one.. i wonder how many of those frisbees people have actually used...
i like this quote
Windows Millennium Edition (aka Me, or the Mistake Edition)