HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

Tural wrote:Stop inciting conflicts.

hey im not inciting any more conflicts than you have done here.

Tural wrote:

JacksonCougAr wrote:For people wishing to render them <_<
But from a pure modding stand-point, no.

NO WAY

Way to be mature there tural.
Your doing a excelent job at showing a good example to the users here arn't you?

im sorry i can only read legible english please translate for me.

Who honestly cares? There is no reason to debate this. I hope you're not spending your time obsessing over people not liking something you like. Who cares about people ranting at unknown users in the rant thread? anyways. to me, i find vista alot more smooth and stream lined than xp. xp is just lik...

Collision model errors much?

SnaFuBAR wrote:massive poly waste. those plates don't have to be the same mesh as the barrels; they can intersect.

Not if you don't want a higher chance of overlapping faces.
All things considered it is a decent model.

you noe i'm not good modder. That is no excuse for asking for critiizm and complaining when its not all fluffy and bright colours. The skin sucks to be quite honest im sure i would do the same thing merely by editing the multipurpose. read up on some tutorials look more closely to your reference pi...

UPS wrote:

Doom wrote:Modified Halo 1 sniper? Wooo ?

What? You were expecting a full mod with a couple of dragons drinking tea over a game of poker? I didn't say it was a mod, I said it was a model.

actualy yes he was,
y'see he was a member of CMT so he would expect a full mod.

thinkreddie wrote:

Thinkreddies smokign with magic again

hit it with a sledge hammer.
in all seriousness could try keep pressing it and seeing if it loosens up.

JacksonCougAr wrote:Everybody to teh Happyness thread!

Stop teh hating!

Nien.

SHOUTrvb wrote:I thought it was mildly amusing.. only because I could picture Kornman and Snafu going at it.

battle of the ego's

Economic Left/Right: -4.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18


according to this i am close to the same political thought as gandhi.

Christ. You said the moon would not be visible due to a low resolution. I said it is visibly large, which is why it is captured in the low resolution image. Stars are incredibly small when seen from Earth, and subsequently are affected by resolution. It's really, really, really not a difficult thin...

Neither does the fact of the moons size.
The stars are extremely large yet i dont see anyone taking clear pictures of them with low pixel resolution camera phones, do you?

Tural wrote:The moon is a significantly sized object.

So are the stars yet you can normaly only see them during the dark due to the surrounding light blinding them out.

Philly wrote:So's your face.

preston566 wrote:
-- Why wouldn't a CellPhone be able to see the moon?

Too low of a pixel resolution.

I hope this isnt a rip off from what Phenomena did a few years ago

Mr.Brightside wrote:

Philly wrote:*Sigh*
Go and read the entire thread, then you'll understand.

*Sigh*
no need to get cheeky with me. The thread isn't there. That's why I was asking.

Because pepsi decided to remove it

its obviously the people tural likes the most